Re: Obfuscated definitions of database objects
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Obfuscated definitions of database objects |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 46CF0AC6.9070004@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Obfuscated definitions of database objects ("Charles N. Charotti" <ccharotti@yahoo.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Obfuscated definitions of database objects
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Charles N. Charotti wrote: > Hi Everybody, > > I want to know if there is any plan in future versions > of PG to obfuscate the source code of some objects of > the database, specially the functions of the backend ? Functions in the backend written with most of the standard pl langauges are interpreted. Thus no, they are plain text. If you need obfuscation (and you don't, you just think you do, no offense) use C. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake - -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ UNIQUE NOT NULL Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGzwrGATb/zqfZUUQRAphWAKCcq/RqRBabxKaqmaFHWbmqARITKgCfQcFg Rg9u49kQcbVHz2ghhD3ZOd0= =b+yg -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: