Re: AIX compilation problems (was Re: Proposal ...)
От | Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD |
---|---|
Тема | Re: AIX compilation problems (was Re: Proposal ...) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 46C15C39FEB2C44BA555E356FBCD6FA4961EA0@m0114.s-mxs.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | AIX compilation problems (was Re: Proposal ...) (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: AIX compilation problems (was Re: Proposal ...)
Re: AIX compilation problems (was Re: Proposal ...) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > configure somehow thinks it needs to #define _LARGE_FILES though, which > > then clashes with pg_config.h's _LARGE_FILES. I think the test needs to > > #include unistd.h . > > _LARGE_FILES is defined because it's necessary to make off_t 64 bits. If > you disagree, please post compiler output. Ah, if we want off_t to be 64 bits, then we need _LARGE_FILES. The problem is, that scan.c includes unistd.h before postgres.h and thus unistd.h defines _LARGE_FILE_API which is not allowed together with _LARGE_FILES. Do you know an answer ? Offhand I can only think of using -D_LARGE_FILES as a compiler flag :-( Do we really want a general 64 bit off_t or would it be sufficient in the two places that use fseeko ? Andreas
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: