Re: elog() patch
От | Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD |
---|---|
Тема | Re: elog() patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 46C15C39FEB2C44BA555E356FBCD6FA41EB533@m0114.s-mxs.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | elog() patch (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter writes: > > I am referring to "completion condition" messages according > to SQLSTATE: > > > > 00xxx: Success > > This is an INFO (or no message at all). The idea was that things like the > automatic index creation for a PK would be INFO, and you could easily turn > off INFO somehow. > > > 01xxx: Success with Warning > > This is a NOTICE. > > > 02xxx: Success but no rows found > > This is nothing special. > > > 03 and > : Failure > > This is is ERROR or above. > > > I see that there is no notion of INFO, thus I agree that INFO should not be > > something normally sent to the user. INFO could be the first DEBUG Level, > > or completely skipped. > > It's sort of the "tip" level. A lot of people don't like to see them, so > it's reasonable to separate them from NOTICE. You could think of them as > first debug level, if you like. All agreed, matches what I was trying to say. Only I like the keyword WARNING more than NOTICE. Andreas
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: