Re: Point in Time Recovery
От | Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Point in Time Recovery |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 46C15C39FEB2C44BA555E356FBCD6FA40184D134@m0114.s-mxs.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Point in Time Recovery (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Point in Time Recovery
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Well, Tom does seem to have something with regard to StartUpIds. I feel > it is easier to force a new timeline by adding a very large number to > the LogId IF, and only if, we have performed an archive recovery. That > way, we do not change at all the behaviour of the system for people that > choose not to implement archive_mode. Imho you should take a close look at StartUpId, I think it is exactly this "large number". Maybe you can add +2 to intentionally leave a hole. Once you increment, I think it is very essential to checkpoint and double check pg_control, cause otherwise a crashrecovery would read the wrong xlogs. > Should we implement timelines? Yes :-) Andreas
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: