Re: Volunteers required - functionality checklist
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Volunteers required - functionality checklist |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 46C028D3.1080409@postgresql.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Volunteers required - functionality checklist (Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>) |
Ответы |
Re: Volunteers required - functionality checklist
Re: Volunteers required - functionality checklist |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: > Dave Page wrote: >> Following a discussion last week we need to write a good bullet point >> list of PostgreSQL's technical features. They key aim is to provide a >> nice checklist for potential new users. It should not be wordy, but >> certain key features which deserve more explanation should be made links >> to explanatory pages (of particular importance here is Replication which >> should point to a page describing our policy on replication in core, and >> the colutions available. > > what's wrong with: > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/interactive/high-availability.html Well, it's tucked away in the docs, and is more concerned with describing techniques than actual solutions. For example, there are no links to Slony, pgCluster, pgPool etc. The aim here is to dispell the myth that postgres doesn't have replication, so we want something quick and to the point, with the relevant links to get people started that we can feature fairly prominently on the website. >> In conjunction with this, the following pages should be reviewed and >> updated as appropriate: >> >> http://www.postgresql.org/about/ >> http://www.postgresql.org/about/advantages >> >> It might also be nice to incorporate Stefan's feature matrix at >> http://developer.postgresql.org/index.php/Feature_Matrix, though this >> should *not* be part of the main feature checklist page. > > yeah not sure how that would fit A seperate page I suspect - just a link of the main page to the by-version comparison. >> >> I would suggest this work is undertaken on the wiki at >> developer.postgresql.org to aid collaboration. > > seems like the proper place for that > >> >> Volunteers please? :-) > > definitly interested in helping with that effort. Interested in leading it? I've got to the point at the moment that even working more or less full time on community stuff I just don't have time to push through every good idea that people throw at me :-( Thanks in advance :-p /D
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: