-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
David Fetter wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 07:32:15PM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
>> Mike Ellsworth wrote:
> Dave,
>
> I know you mean well, but in this case, you created, at best, the
> appearance of a conflict of interest. Next time, please ask somebody
> not employed at EnterpriseDB to review such pieces.
Actually this is probably a good idea in general. It isn't a question of
inappropriateness but the appearance of thus by *any* member. We have
quite a few prominent members employed by several prominent postgresql
companies.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> Cheers,
> David.
- --
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGuhTzATb/zqfZUUQRAvqrAJ9FqJ2iIAp1N9PXVy4DCndBXLm1OQCfVqRr
ufGbtFJpna/oZ+NZEvjWOD4=
=YhsN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----