Re: HOT patch, missing things
| От | Mark Mielke |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: HOT patch, missing things |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 46B8CB7B.7090105@mark.mielke.cc обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: HOT patch, missing things (Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>) |
| Ответы |
Re: HOT patch, missing things
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: > Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > >> 2. Pointer swinging. At the moment, after a row is HOT updated, the only >> way to get rid of the redirecting line pointer is to run VACUUM FULL or >> CLUSTER (or delete or cold update the row and vacuum). If we want to >> implement pointer swinging before release, we have to get started now. >> If we're happy to release without it and address the issue in later >> releases if it seems important, we need to make a conscious decision on >> that, now. I personally think we can release without it. >> > hmm - I don't really understand most of the stuff behind HOT but does > this mean that VACUUM FULL (or CLUSTER) is becoming a recommended or > even required routine maintenance task for people using HOT ? > No more than before. See the comment "or delete or cold update the row and vacuum". The row couldn't be cleared by vacuum before unless delete/update. Based on the above, it appears that every time an HOT update occurs, 4 to 8 bytes might get wasted in the page. Eventually this fills the page and a regular cold update is required and it is cleared. Cheers, mark -- Mark Mielke <mark@mielke.cc>
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: