Re: Postgres 8.2 binary for ubuntu 6.10?
От | 李彦 Ian Li |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgres 8.2 binary for ubuntu 6.10? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 46B67633.3000506@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Postgres 8.2 binary for ubuntu 6.10? (novnov <novnovice@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Postgres 8.2 binary for ubuntu 6.10?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
You may import the adminpack.sql come with the -contrib-8.2 package to create those administrative functions. Regards novnov wrote: > I installed 8.2 on ubuntu 6.10 using the backport a while ago. In pgadmin III > I still can't connect to the server settings. When I open server status in > pgadmin on the ubuntu box, it first messages me that server instrumentation > functions are missing and then presents what may be a subset of the server > status. The dialog is for 8.2, 8.1 is no longer installed. But everything > I've read indicates that 8.2 should include what's needed. Using the > synaptic manager I see that postgresql 8.2, -client-8.2, -client-common, > -common, -contrib-8.2 are installed...is there one missing that would bring > the extended server status functionality with it? > > > novnov wrote: >> Thanks all of you. It does seem like the backport is the way to go. >> >> So now I have 8.2 and some new postgres/linux newb questions. >> >> I can safely remove 8.1 after moving data using synaptic, ie 8.2 shouldn't >> be dependent on 8.1 at all? >> >> I don't understand how postgres is installed with these package managers. >> The windows installer asks me for the superuser name (postgres is the >> default) and I provide a password. There is an option to run as a service, >> and a windows user acct can be created for that. After the synaptic >> install, postgres seems to be running as a service. I see a postgres user >> account is created 'postgres' but don't know what the password is? >> >> Finally, I've never been able to get pgadmin to work on linux. I can't >> connect, probably because the password is unknown, but another question is >> the host address, is localhost is ok? >> >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: