Re: [pgsql-www] We need an Advocacy wiki
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [pgsql-www] We need an Advocacy wiki |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 46B4B9C8.1090200@hagander.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [pgsql-www] We need an Advocacy wiki (Decibel! <decibel@decibel.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: [pgsql-www] We need an Advocacy wiki
Re: [pgsql-www] We need an Advocacy wiki |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Decibel! wrote: >> As long as that holds, I'm absolutely up for giving it a try. Maybe part >> of the disagreement has been from a misunderstanding of what a "public >> wiki" is. In my book, a *public* wiki is one that doesn't need a >> verified account. (I assume that you refer to verified account above. If >> not, I don't agree until you add the word verified) > > Well, at the bare minimum we need a captcha or something similar. > Without that then yes, we're going to get all kinds of crap accounts. > Do we just have that turned off, or does mediawiki actually not support > that? I'd say we want email verification, so that we can contact the authors when needed. That said, I have no clue about mediawiki ;-) //Magnus
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: