Re: [pgsql-www] We need an Advocacy wiki
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [pgsql-www] We need an Advocacy wiki |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 46B4B2EF.2070308@hagander.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [pgsql-www] We need an Advocacy wiki (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [pgsql-www] We need an Advocacy wiki
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Gregory Stark wrote: > "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg@turnstep.com> writes: > >> Not sure what your definition of normal is; that depends on what you mean by >> "registered". If it means just creating an account via web form, that's >> harldy an impediment to vandalism. We can certainly give more people the power >> to grant write-access to wiki accounts, if that's the perceived hold up. > > Do we have any history of vandalism on the -hackers mailing list? There is no > approval mechanism for people subscribing to the list. Would people be happy > if every subscription to -hackers required someone to approve your membership? No, but we *do* have a history of vandalism/spamming on the website. This includes the interactive docs, news posts, event posts and professional services. That's pretty much every single part of the website that actually has a submit button, except for the bug reporting form - which goes through the majordomo moderation system so it's still moderated. But - it helped significantly when we started requesting community logins for these forms. It's still not gone - there are people advertising for UK hotels and a few other things that actually sign up for a community account with a temp email address and post from there. This is the main reason why we still have manual verification on all these things even though they require a login. That said, allowing people to sign up for an account in an automated way that does require email verification would work, as long as there is: 1) A way to revoke and ban addresses 2) Somebody to keep track of things, and remove spam and revoke/ban these users. (this would be the same level of verification that we have for the mailinglists - it's not like they're unvalidated) But the work required for (2) is a lot less than a completely open system of course. If there are a couple of people who are willing to take that upon them (which there seems to be, given the activity on the wiki) we could always give that a try? //Magnus
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: