Re: Strange ODBC behavior.
От | Paul Lambert |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Strange ODBC behavior. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 46B2E981.5000902@autoledgers.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Strange ODBC behavior. (Paul Lambert <paul.lambert@autoledgers.com.au>) |
Ответы |
Re: Strange ODBC behavior.
Re: Strange ODBC behavior. Re: Strange ODBC behavior. |
Список | pgsql-odbc |
Paul Lambert wrote: > I had a server have a power outage on one of my PostgreSQL servers > yesterday and am having a strange ODBC issue now - not sure if they are > related occurances though. > > I have a table called billing_code and one called models in my database. > If I connect via psql to the database with my standard db user I can see > both of these tables as well as the data contained within. > > If I attempt to link these tables from MS Access, the billing_code one > returns "The Microsoft Jet database engine could not find the object > 'public.billing_code'. Make sure the object exists and that you spell > its name and the path name correctly" - this error despite the fact that > I had to physically select the table from a list it presented me when I > went into the linked table manager. > > If I link the models table, it links fine, but when I attempt to open > it, I just get #Deleted in every column of every row for about 54,000 > rows (the total number in the table) > > The same problem happens with some of the other tables in the database - > some will get the first problem, some will get the second problem, and > some will link and load data without issue. > > I was running odbc driver 8.02.02, I've upgraded to 8.02.04 - just in > case there was a problem with the driver getting corrupted but the > problem persists. > > Can anyone offer any thoughts or suggestions on what the problem might be? > > Thanks in advance, > Paul. > I've done a full pg_dump, deleted the database and tablespaces, recreated everything, restored the data and the same behavior is being exhibited - at least as far as returning #Deleted in some of the tables. Users with an Access database that already has the table linked don't have a problem accessing the data, but those adding a new link to the table do. Any thoughts on this or is it more of an access issue? -- Paul Lambert Database Administrator AutoLedgers
В списке pgsql-odbc по дате отправления: