Re: Data on NAS / NFS
От | Hannes Dorbath |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Data on NAS / NFS |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 46AE0E54.2040605@theendofthetunnel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Data on NAS / NFS (Jean-Denis Girard <jd.girard@sysnux.pf>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On 28.07.2007 06:48, Jean-Denis Girard wrote: > The NAS would be from LaCie, using 4 disks (Raid5 + spare) > (http://www.lacie.com/fr/products/product.htm?pid=10876), mounted via > NFS from a Linux server running Postgresql . Sorry, but that sounds like a sick setup.. 1.) RAID 5 is a bad choice for a DBMS, due to implicit reads caused by parity calculation. 2.) Most cheap NAS (such as this one) have way to high latency for a DBMS. 3.) NFS is nothing you want to have a DBMS running on top. 4.) I don't think this device has battery backed cache. 5.) At least I have bad experiences with Lacie storage devices (Bigger Disk Extreme) To sum it up.. I'd say what you get with that setup is a dead slow, unstable PostgreSQL experience with a good chance of data corruption on power failure. -- Regards, Hannes Dorbath
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: