Re: (wtf) Top 20 Open Source Software Projects in the Enterprise
От | Brian Hurt |
---|---|
Тема | Re: (wtf) Top 20 Open Source Software Projects in the Enterprise |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 46A5F162.7060705@janestcapital.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: (wtf) Top 20 Open Source Software Projects in the Enterprise ("Jim C. Nasby" <decibel@decibel.org>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
Brian
I also find it humorous that vim made the list, but emacs didn't. Note that I'm a vim user, not an emacs user, so I'm only "amused", not "annoyed". But it does make me question the accuracy of the list.On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 01:12:07AM -0300, Guido Barosio wrote:http://www.cioupdate.com/trends/article.php/3689871 Only one database there, MySQL, wtf.To quote... "To come up with its Top 20 list, OpenLogic, a provider of open source solutions that help its 700 Global 2000 enterprise customers acquire, support, track and control open source software, queries its customers as to which open source software projects they are using." The reason MySQL shows and PostgreSQL doesn't is that there's all kinds of other OSS projects that use MySQL, so it ends up in the door that way. It's also got way more people that know it. PostgreSQL OTOH typically only goes into an organization if they either run into problems they can't solve in MySQL or if there's a (loud) internal advocate. This is why I disagree with the notion that MySQL isn't our competition... this shows how it's popularity ends up hurting us.
Brian
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: