Re: 8.2 is 30% better in pgbench than 8.3
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 8.2 is 30% better in pgbench than 8.3 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 46A570BB.2010202@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 8.2 is 30% better in pgbench than 8.3 (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Gregory Stark wrote: > "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes: > >>> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes: >>>> I am taking the liberty to also lower the vacuum and analyze threshold >>>> default values to 50, per previous discussion. > > Did we also reach any consensus about lowering the percentage of dead tuples > in a table before we trigger vacuum? I think 20% is way too high and 5% is > saner. I actually think it would be better even lower but would be ok with 5%. I think that 5-10% is reasonable, 20% is way to high. Joshua D. Drake -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: