Vacuum full considered useful ;)
От | Patric de Waha |
---|---|
Тема | Vacuum full considered useful ;) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4698F0CF.7000602@p-dw.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: Vacuum full considered useful ;)
Re: Vacuum full considered useful ;) Re: Vacuum full considered useful ;) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Hi, Something I'd like to share. I switched to postgres about 4 months ago. The perfomance after a while got worse. I posted a message here, where the result was that my IO was the problem. I run vacuum every night. I never used vacuum full because it is not explicitly recommended and I read somewhere in the archives a mail that the consistency of the db suffered after a vacuum full run. Yesterday I switched from 8.1 to 8.2. So I needed to dump the dbase and reimport it. The dbase after 4 months of running without "vacuum full" reached 60 gigabyte of diskspace. Now after a fresh import it only has 5 gigabyte! No wonder, I got IO problems with such a fragmentation. For people not very familiar with postgres especially those coming from mysql, i'd recommend paying attention to this. regards, patric de waha
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: