Re: [GENERAL] Count(*) throws error
От | Richard Huxton |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] Count(*) throws error |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 46966ED5.4080204@archonet.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] Count(*) throws error (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Again, I'm trying to look at the big picture of both syntactic and > semantic errors. If we solve only the syntactic end of it I think we'd > actually be worse off, because then users would be even more lost when > they hit a semantic error (unwanted substitution). The only real solution is to have some clear syntactic sugar denoting where variables are to be interpolated: SELECT * FROM foo WHERE (bar + 1) = bar -- Which is the var? SELECT * FROM fooWHERE (bar + 1) = $bar -- OK SELECT * FROM foo WHERE (bar + 1) = {bar} -- OK It's not clear to plpgsql because it's *not clear*. In any other namespace-conflict situation I can think of it's always inner-definition-is-visible. This would of course solve the problem, but only by preventing you from substituting in variablesthat conflict with columns. Unless you generate a warning at function compile-time that doesn't seem much better. -- Richard Huxton Archonet Ltd
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: