Re: inferior SCSI performance
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: inferior SCSI performance |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4693.1063825713@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | inferior SCSI performance (Michael Adler <adler@pobox.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: inferior SCSI performance
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Michael Adler <adler@pobox.com> writes: > I have been experimenting with a new Seagate Cheetah 10k-RPM SCSI to > compare with a cheaper Seagate Barracuda 7200-RPM IDE (each in a > single-drive configuration). The Cheetah definately dominates the generic > IO tests such as bonnie++, but fares poorly with pgbench (and other > postgresql operations). It's fairly common for ATA drives to be configured to lie about write completion (ie, claim write-complete as soon as data is accepted into their onboard RAM buffer), whereas SCSI drives usually report write complete only when the data is actually down to disk. The performance differential may thus be coming at the expense of reliability. If you run Postgres with fsync off, does the differential go away? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: