Re: ACM Paper relevant to our buffer algorithm
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ACM Paper relevant to our buffer algorithm |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 468B71CF.6050201@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ACM Paper relevant to our buffer algorithm (Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: ACM Paper relevant to our buffer algorithm
Re: ACM Paper relevant to our buffer algorithm |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Greg Smith wrote: > Here are some more recent papers that also give good insight into > research in this area: > > http://www.cs.usask.ca/~wew036/comprehensive.pdf > http://www.cse.ohio-state.edu/hpcs/WWW/HTML/publications/papers/TR-05-3.pdf Nice papers. What I'd like to see is a paper on precleaning strategies. I tried to google for one but couldn't find any. That would be very relevant to the bgwriter tuning discussions. I'm still struggling to understand why and how bgwriter increases performance. Under what circumstances, what workload? The only benefit I can see is that it moves the write() of a page out of the critical path. But as long as the OS cache can absorb the write, it should be very cheap compared to doing real I/O. Apparently the workload that benefits most is an OLTP workload where response times are critical, on a database that doesn't fit in share_buffers, but fits in OS cache. Am I missing something? What kind of a test would show the most benefit? -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: