Re: What O/S or hardware feature would be useful for databases?
От | Ron Johnson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: What O/S or hardware feature would be useful for databases? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 468AC39D.8060300@cox.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: What O/S or hardware feature would be useful for databases? ("Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: What O/S or hardware feature would be useful for databases?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 07/03/07 13:03, Merlin Moncure wrote: > On 7/2/07, Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net> wrote: >> On 06/18/07 08:05, Merlin Moncure wrote: >> [snip] >> > >> > That being said, it's pretty clear to me we are in the last days of >> > the disk drive. >> >> Oh, puhleeze. Seagate, Hitachi, Fuji and WD aren't sitting around >> with their thumbs up their arses. In 3-4 years, large companies >> and spooky TLAs will be stuffing SANs with hundreds of 2TB drives. > > haven't we had this debate before? > > I don't know if you've been paying attention to what's going on in the > storage industry...Apple, Dell, Fuji, Sandisk, Intel, and others are > all making strategic plays in the flash market. At the outset of > 2007, flash was predicted to decline 50% for the year...so far, prices > have dropped 65% in the first two quarters. Right now it's all about > the high end notebooks and media players but the high margin, high > rotation speed drives are next. Technological nay-sayers have been wrong before, but I just can't see a *database* server full of static RAM in the next 10 years. > I admit the high density low speed > cold storage d2d backup systems will be the last to fall and will be > quite some ways off. > > note by, 'next', and 'last days', i mean that pretty loosely...within > the next 5 years or so. 'dead' as well...there are many stages of > death to an enterprise legacy product. I consider tape backups to be > nearly dead already, although there are many still in use. d2d is > where it's at though. Mainframers (and various other oldsters like me) think about 1) shock resistance, 2) media costs, 3) Iron Mountain, 4) media longevity. You can drop a SuperDLT tape from "man height" and recover the data (even if it has to be restrung into a new housing). I wouldn't drop a disk full of data and have any expectation of survival. A 160GB ("320"GB compressed) SATA drive is about $60 plus a $10 carrier. That comparable very well to tapes, I think. An Iron Mountain delivery truck will drive over some nasty bumps. How shock resistant is a disk drive in an external carrier? Not as resistant as a drive in a padded shipping box. But is it resistant "enough"? "Enterprise-level" tapes can sit in storage for 7-15 years and then still be readable. Can a disk drive sit un-used for 7 years? Would the motor freeze up? Will we still be able to connect SATA drives in 7 years? -- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson LA USA Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day. Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: