Re: Proposal for new pgsqlODBC feature - hiding tables inaccessible to the current user
| От | Dave Page |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Proposal for new pgsqlODBC feature - hiding tables inaccessible to the current user |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4683D9A3.7010307@postgresql.org обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Proposal for new pgsqlODBC feature - hiding tables inaccessible to the current user (Hiroshi Inoue <inoue@tpf.co.jp>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Proposal for new pgsqlODBC feature
- hiding tables inaccessible to the current user
Re: Proposal for new pgsqlODBC feature - hiding tables inaccessible to the current user |
| Список | pgsql-odbc |
Hiroshi Inoue wrote: > Mark Cave-Ayland wrote: >> On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 09:01 +0900, Hiroshi Inoue wrote: >> >>> How about changing the default behavior of SQLTables to list only >>> SELECTable tables and add a bit to Extra Opts to list inaccessible >>> tables also ? >> I think this would risk breaking a lot of existing applications. > > Really ? > I can hardly imagine the applications which would update/delete > the rows whose contents couldn't be seen. insert-only audit tables? Yes, they should really be handled by server-side triggers, but I know of at least a couple of apps running on PostgreSQL with psqlODBC that do it client side. Regards, Dave
В списке pgsql-odbc по дате отправления: