Re: Any examples of companies using PG in high volume
От | Jonathan Nalley |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Any examples of companies using PG in high volume |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4682.192.168.0.6.1111616526.squirrel@192.168.0.6 обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Any examples of companies using PG in high volume and/or large scale environs... (David B <davidb999@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-admin |
you'll probably find some answers in the comments of a similar Slashdot post: http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/03/21/1635210 Check out http://advocacy.postgresql.org Two other examples are Whitepages.com (375GB) and the .org registry as well. On Wed, March 23, 2005 17:07, David B said: > I've been looking for examples of high volume (in terms of throughput) > and large scale (500GB-terabtype+) examples of Postgres > impllmenetations. > > I keep seeing the same few examples (BASF, Los Alamos Labs, Futijsu > and .info administrator). Impossible to tell anything from the names. > .info administrator might be dealing with 100 transactions per > hour...or per second. Not seen anything on that. And a few hundred > .info records may add up to less than 1GB. > > I've seen nothing showing real world numbers in terms of hourly/daily > transactions activity and nothing showing how large the databases > really are. > >From experience I've come to seek clarification of the meaning of > statements such as "we have a hugh database". One persons hugh is 1GB > while another's is 100GB while another's is 1TB+. And as one who has > dealt with TB+ in Oracle the issues are way different. > > Can any of you suggest some companies I can point to as I try to > convince my company to move to it. We will be storing 100's GB of > data. > > tia > David > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster >
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: