Re: PostgreSQL Configuration Tool for Dummies
От | Scott Marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL Configuration Tool for Dummies |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 467A9561.9060706@g2switchworks.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL Configuration Tool for Dummies (Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL Configuration Tool for Dummies
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Greg Smith wrote: > On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, Josh Berkus wrote: > >> I don't think the "mostly reads / mostly writes" question covers >> anything, >> nor is it likely to produce accurate answers. Instead, we need to >> ask the >> users to characterize what type of application they are running: >> T1) Please characterize the general type of workload you will be >> running on >> this database. Choose one of the following four... > > We've hashed through this area before, but for Lance's benefit I'll > reiterate my dissenting position on this subject. If you're building > a "tool for dummies", my opinion is that you shouldn't ask any of this > information. I think there's an enormous benefit to providing > something that takes basic sizing information and gives conservative > guidelines based on that--as you say, "safe, middle-of-the-road > values"--that are still way, way more useful than the default values. > The risk in trying to make a complicated tool that satisfies all the > users Josh is aiming his more sophisticated effort at is that you'll > lose the newbies. Generally I agree, however, how about a first switch, for beginner / intermediate / advanced. The choice you make determines how much detail we ask you about your setup. Beginners get two or three simple questions, intermediate a handful, and advanced gets grilled on everything. Then, just write the beginner and maybe intermediate to begin with and ghost out the advanced until it's ready.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: