Re: [GENERAL] [PERFORM] [ADMIN] Postgres VS Oracle
От | John Meyer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] [PERFORM] [ADMIN] Postgres VS Oracle |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4677472F.9020806@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] [PERFORM] [ADMIN] Postgres VS Oracle (PFC <lists@peufeu.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [GENERAL] [PERFORM] [ADMIN] Postgres VS Oracle
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
PFC wrote: > >> 2. Oracle, Microsoft, and IBM have a "lot" to fear in the sense of a >> database like PostgreSQL. We can compete in 90-95% of cases where >> people would traditionally purchase a proprietary system for many, >> many thousands (if not hundreds of thousands) of dollars. > > Oracle also fears benchmarks made by people who don't know how to > tune Oracle properly... > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to > choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not > match > Then Oracle fears its users, which explains the "no-benchmark" policy, which I cannot see any PR honk being able to spin that in any way that doesn't make Oracle look like it's hiding its head in the sand. -- The NCP Revue -- http://www.ncprevue.com/blog
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: