Re: [GENERAL] [PERFORM] [ADMIN] Postgres VS Oracle
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] [PERFORM] [ADMIN] Postgres VS Oracle |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4676C19D.4040702@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [ADMIN] Postgres VS Oracle ("Jonah H. Harris" <jonah.harris@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [GENERAL] [PERFORM] [ADMIN] Postgres VS Oracle
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
PFC wrote: > >> 2. Oracle, Microsoft, and IBM have a "lot" to fear in the sense of a >> database like PostgreSQL. We can compete in 90-95% of cases where >> people would traditionally purchase a proprietary system for many, >> many thousands (if not hundreds of thousands) of dollars. > > Oracle also fears benchmarks made by people who don't know how to > tune Oracle properly... Yes that is one argument that is made (and a valid one) but it is assuredly not the only one that can be made, that would be legitimate. Joshua D. Drake > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at > > http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate > -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: