Re: Performance regression on CVS head
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Performance regression on CVS head |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 466D4DB7.5030502@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Performance regression on CVS head (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com> writes: >>> I tried to repeat the DBT-2 runs with the "oldestxmin refresh" patch, >>> but to my surprise the baseline run with CVS head, without the patch, >>> behaved very differently than it did back in March. >> >>> I rerun the a shorter 1h test with CVS head from May 20th, and March >>> 6th (which is when I ran the earlier tests), and something has >>> clearly been changed between those dates that affects the test. Test >>> run 248 is with CVS checkout from May 20th, and 249 is from March 6th: >> >> May 20th is not quite my idea of "HEAD" ;-). It might be worth checking >> current code before investing any think-time on this. But having said >> that, it looks a bit like a planner problem --- if I'm reading the >> graphs correctly, I/O wait time goes through the roof, suggesting a >> change to a much less efficient plan. > > I tracked this down to the patch to enable plan invalidation for SPI plans: > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2007-03/msg00136.php > > Apparently the vacuum causes a plan invalidation and a worse plan is > chosen. I'll dig deeper into which queries are being affected and why. > Unless someone has any better ideas. Ok, found it. The plan for stock-level transaction changed as a result of a lot of dead tuples in the district table. I turned autovacuum on for the small, frequently-updated tables, and that fixed the problem. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: