Re: Autovacuum launcher doesn't notice death of postmaster immediately
От | Matthew T. O'Connor |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Autovacuum launcher doesn't notice death of postmaster immediately |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4669DAFB.1060600@zeut.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Autovacuum launcher doesn't notice death of postmaster immediately (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Autovacuum launcher doesn't notice death of postmaster immediately
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Jim C. Nasby escribió: >> There *is* reason to allow setting the naptime smaller, though (or at >> least there was; perhaps Alvero's recent changes negate this need): >> clusters that have a large number of databases. I've worked with folks >> who are in a hosted environment and give each customer their own >> database; it's not hard to get a couple hundred databases that way. >> Setting the naptime higher than a second in such an environment would >> mean it could be hours before a database is checked for vacuuming. > > Yes, the code in HEAD is different -- each database will be considered > separately. So the huge database taking all day to vacuum will not stop > the tiny databases from being vacuumed in a timely manner. > > And the very huge table in that database will not stop the other tables > in the database from being vacuumed either. There can be more than one > worker in a single database. Ok, but I think the question posed is that in say a virtual hosting environment there might be say 1,000 databases in the cluster. Am I still going to have to wait a long time for my database to get vacuumed? I don't think this has changed much no? (If default naptime is 1 minute, then autovacuum won't even look at a given database but once every 1,000 minutes (16.67 hours) assuming that there isn't enough work to keep all the workers busy.)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: