Re: Weird 8.2.4 performance
| От | Mark Kirkwood |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Weird 8.2.4 performance |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 46674AEF.6040803@paradise.net.nz обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Weird 8.2.4 performance (Kurt Overberg <kurt@hotdogrecords.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Weird 8.2.4 performance
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
Kurt Overberg wrote: > Explain Outputs: > > -- 8.2 > > > -> Bitmap Heap Scan on taskinstance (cost=20.71..2143.26 rows=556 > width=8) (actual time=421.423..5655.745 rows=98 loops=9) > Recheck Cond: (taskinstance.taskid = task.id) > -> Bitmap Index Scan on taskid_taskinstance_key > (cost=0.00..20.57 rows=556 width=0) (actual time=54.709..54.709 rows=196 > loops=9) > -- 8.0 > > -> Index Scan using taskid_taskinstance_key on taskinstance > (cost=0.00..2152.28 rows=563 width=8) (actual time=0.012..0.832 rows=145 > loops=11) 8.2 is deciding to use a bitmap index scan on taskid_taskinstance_key, which seems to be slower (!) than a plain old index scan that 8.0 is using. A dirty work around is to disable bitmap scans via: SET enable_bitmapscan=off but it is probably worthwhile to try to find out *why* the bitmap scan is 1) slow and 2) chosen at all given 1). One thought that comes to mind - is work_mem smaller on your 8.2 system than the 8.0 one? (or in fact is it very small on both?). Also it might be interesting to see your non-default postgresql.conf settings for both systems. Cheers Mark
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: