Re: primary key display in psql
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: primary key display in psql |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4667.1263419257@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | primary key display in psql (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: primary key display in psql
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > I think we could easily improve that by having it look something like > this instead: > Table "public.test2" > Column | Type | Modifiers > --------+---------+----------- > a | integer | PK > b | integer | PK > Indexes: > "test2_pkey" PRIMARY KEY, btree (a, b) Spelling out "primary key" would seem to be more in keeping with existing entries in that column, eg we have "not null" not "NN". I think this is a sensible proposal for a single-column PK, but am less sure that it makes sense for multi-col. The modifiers column is intended to describe column constraints; which a multi-col PK is not, by definition. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: