Re: Transactional DDL
От | Ron Johnson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Transactional DDL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4661BD1F.5090005@cox.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Transactional DDL ("Jasbinder Singh Bali" <jsbali@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On 06/02/07 13:35, Jasbinder Singh Bali wrote: > On 6/2/07, Michael Glaesemann <grzm@seespotcode.net> wrote: >> >> >> On Jun 2, 2007, at 11:08 , Harpreet Dhaliwal wrote: >> >> > Whats so novel about postgresql here? >> > This would happen in any RDBMS. right? >> > You induced divide by zero exception that crashed the whole >> > transaction and it did not create the table bar? >> >> [Please don't top-post. It makes the discussion hard to follow.] >> >> I used the divide by zero to raise an error to show that both the >> CREATE TABLE and the INSERT were rolled back when the transaction >> failed. If there's another definition of transactional DDL, I'd like >> to know what it is. >> >> Michael Glaesemann >> grzm seespotcode net > > > This is what happens in every RDBMS. Whats so special about postgres then? But it's NOT what happens in every RDBMS. Oracle implicitly executes a COMMIT after every DDL statement. -- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson LA USA Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day. Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: