Re: multimaster
От | Guy Rouillier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: multimaster |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 46609C89.2080804@burntmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: multimaster (was: Slightly OT.) ("Alexander Staubo" <alex@purefiction.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: multimaster
Re: multimaster |
Список | pgsql-general |
Alexander Staubo wrote: > As it stands today, horizontally partitioning a database into multiple > separate "shards" is incredibly invasive on the application > architecture, and typically relies on brittle and non-obvious hacks > such as configuring sequence generators with staggered starting > numbers, omitting referential integrity constraints, sacrificing > transactional semantics, and moving query aggregation into the app > level. On top of this, dumb caches such as Memcached are typically > layered to avoid hitting the database in the first place. Have you looked at raidb? http://c-jdbc.objectweb.org. Narrow niche, but if it happens to be the one you are in, then it's an option. I took a quick look at the user's page, and both of them were using PostgreSQL. -- Guy Rouillier
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: