Re: Seq Scan
От | Dan Harris |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Seq Scan |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 46605055.3070305@drivefaster.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Seq Scan ("Tyler Durden" <tylersticky@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Tyler Durden wrote: > Hi, > I'm having some problems in performance in a simple select count(id) > from.... I have 700 000 records in one table, and when I do: > > # explain select (id) from table_name; > -[ RECORD 1 > ]---------------------------------------------------------------- > QUERY PLAN | Seq Scan on table_name (cost=0.00..8601.30 rows=266730 > width=4) > > I had created an index for id(btree), but still shows "Seq Scan". > What I'm doing wrong? > > Thanks, > Tyler > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? > > http://archives.postgresql.org select count(*) will *always* do a sequential scan, due to the MVCC architecture. See archives for much discussion about this. -Dan
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: