Re: Not ready for 8.3
От | Florian G. Pflug |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Not ready for 8.3 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 464F1D01.2030908@phlo.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Not ready for 8.3 (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan wrote: > What would making a branch actually do for you? The only advantage I can > see is that it will give you a way of checkpointing your files. As I > remarked upthread, I occasionally use RCS for that. But mostly I don't > actually bother. I don't see how you can do it reasonably off a local > cvs mirror - rsync will just blow away any changes you have checked in > next time you sync with the master. > > I don't think we can make CVS behave like a distributed SCM system, and > ability to create local branches seems to me one of the fundamental > points of such systems. If that's what the demand is for, then we should > look again at moving to something like Mercurial. I think the great thing about DCVS systems is that not everybody necessarily needs to use the *same* system. And it doesn't really matter what the central repository runs on - I think they are gateway from/to nearly everything available... I currently use GIT for my SoC project, and it works quite well - I can create an abitrary number of local branches, and syncing the currently active branch with CVS is archived by just doing "cg-update pgsql-head". greetings, Florian Pflug
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: