Re: Reducing stats collection overhead
От | Arjen van der Meijden |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Reducing stats collection overhead |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 464F05B4.8030800@tweakers.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Reducing stats collection overhead (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Reducing stats collection overhead
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Afaik Tom hadn't finished his patch when I was testing things, so I don't know. But we're in the process of benchmarking a new system (dual quad-core Xeon) and we'll have a look at how it performs in the postgres 8.2dev we used before, the stable 8.2.4 and a fresh HEAD-checkout (which we'll call 8.3dev). I'll let you guys (or at least Tom) know how they compare in our benchmark. Best regards, Arjen On 18-5-2007 15:12 Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Arjen van der Meijden told me that according to the tweakers.net >> benchmark, HEAD is noticeably slower than 8.2.4, and I soon confirmed >> here that for small SELECT queries issued as separate transactions, >> there's a significant difference. I think much of the difference stems >> from the fact that we now have stats_row_level ON by default, and so >> every transaction sends a stats message that wasn't there by default >> in 8.2. When you're doing a few thousand transactions per second >> (not hard for small read-only queries) that adds up. > > So, did this patch make the performance problem go away? >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: