Re: a few questions on backup
От | Marco Colombo |
---|---|
Тема | Re: a few questions on backup |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4649E9EF.9070804@esiway.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: a few questions on backup (Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: a few questions on backup
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Richard Huxton wrote: > It calls archive_command on the just-filled one. Good to know, thanks. I think I'll experiment a bit with archive_command. My point was that since I know (or better assume) that old segments are going to stay in my pg_xlog for *days* before getting recycled, just copying them all after the call to backup_stop() should be enough, in my case. It's more than I need, even. > You do know that pg_dump gives you a guaranteed accurate snapshot of the > database? It doesn't matter if it's in use. Yes, I know, that's why I'm using it. A dump is also useful in that you can restore it even in a different system easier. A text dump allows you to make changes before restoring, even with sed. I'm comfortable with it. The reasons for playing with WAL segments for backups are: 1) learning how it works; 2) everything else is backed up with cpio; 3) at restore time I need to have PG running already, and there may be something different at database initialization. Reason 1) is the driving one, by far. I can handle it for the rest (i.e. the compressed dump is saved as part of the cpio archive). .TM.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: