Re: Concurrently updating an updatable view
От | Florian G. Pflug |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Concurrently updating an updatable view |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4649DFCA.50703@phlo.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Concurrently updating an updatable view (Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>) |
Ответы |
Do we need a TODO? (was Re: Concurrently updating an updatable
view)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Richard Huxton wrote: > Hiroshi Inoue wrote: >> Florian G. Pflug wrote: >> >>> I think there should be a big, fat warning that self-referential >>> updates have highly non-obvious behaviour in read-committed mode, >>> and should be avoided. >> >> It seems pretty difficult for PostgreSQL rule system to avoid such >> kind of updates. I'm suspicious if UPDATABLE VIEWS can be implemented >> using the rule system. > > Remember this affects all self-referential joins on an UPDATE (and > DELETE?) not just views. It's just that a rule is more likely to produce > that type of query. Is there consensus what the correct behaviour should be for self-referential updates in read-committed mode? Does the SQL Spec have anything to say about this? greetings, Florian Pflug
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: