Re: Replication for PG 8 recommendations
От | David Wall |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Replication for PG 8 recommendations |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 46429FF4.4040706@computer.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Replication for PG 8 recommendations (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Replication for PG 8 recommendations
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Thanks. I've seen the options and was hoping for grunt-level realities. Many projects seem to have fallen by the wayside over time.On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 14:40 -0700, David Wall wrote:Is there a "preferred" replication system for PG 8 db users? Obviously, we're looking for robustness, ease of operations/installation, low latency and efficient with system and network resources, with an active open source community being preferred.Jeff Davis wrote: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/static/high-availability.html
My first impression was towards a Slony-I type solution, but I need large objects and would prefer schema updates to be automatic. I was hoping to hear back on any pitfalls or preferences or "how I'd do it if I could do it again" type stories. We mostly need it for disaster recovery since we're looking to improve upon our current nightly backup/syncs in which we pg_dump the database, SCP it to the backup, then pg_restore on the backup. It's possible WAL copying will do it, too, but don't know if people find this workable or not.
David
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: