Re: Best OS for Postgres 8.2
От | Trygve Laugstøl |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Best OS for Postgres 8.2 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 464050F5.3070802@inamo.no обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Best OS for Postgres 8.2 (david@lang.hm) |
Ответы |
Re: [OT] Best OS for Postgres 8.2
Re: Best OS for Postgres 8.2 |
Список | pgsql-performance |
david@lang.hm wrote: > On Tue, 8 May 2007, Trygve Laugstøl wrote: > >>> currently ZFS is only available on Solaris, parts of it have been >>> released >>> under GPLv2, but it doesn't look like enough of it to be ported to >>> Linux >>> (enough was released for grub to be able to access it read-only, but >>> not >>> the full filesystem). there are also patent concerns that are >>> preventing >>> any porting to Linux. >> >> This is not entirely correct. ZFS is only under the CDDL license and >> it has been ported to FreeBSD. >> >> http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss/2007-April/026922.html >> > I wonder how they handled the license issues? I thought that if you > combined stuff that was BSD licensed with stuff with a more restrictive > license the result was under the more restrictive license. thanks for > the info. The CDDL is not a restrictive license like GPL, it is based on the MIT license so it can be used with BSD stuff without problems. There are lots of discussion going on (read: flamewars) on the opensolaris lists about how it can/should it/will it be integrated into linux. > here's a link about the GPLv2 stuff for zfs > > http://blogs.sun.com/darren/entry/zfs_under_gplv2_already_exists That title is fairly misleading as it's only some read-only bits to be able to boot off ZFS with grub. -- Trygve
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: