Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
>>> Maybe it's BSD which is different from the license of psqlodbc (LGPL).
>>> Is there no problem with their coexistence ?
>>> Or is it possible for psqlodbc to be LGPL entirely ?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I am having difficulty in understanding what the problem is. My
>> understanding is that using BSD licensed code is ok in an LGPL
>> project, but (probably) not vice versa.
>
> To my knowledge you can do it either way, as long as you remember that
> any changes to the lgpl code have to be released.
Could you tell me a recommendation ?
I feel completely LGPL one is simpler.
Thanks.
Hiroshi Inoue