Re: New idea for patch tracking
От | Stefan Kaltenbrunner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: New idea for patch tracking |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 463C706F.7090005@kaltenbrunner.cc обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: New idea for patch tracking (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote: > Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: >> Bruce Momjian wrote: >>> Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: >>>> Bruce Momjian wrote: >>>>> Dave Page wrote: >>>>>>> ------- Original Message ------- >>>>>>> From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> >>>>>>> To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org> >>>>>>> Sent: 05/05/07, 03:00:25 >>>>>>> Subject: [HACKERS] New idea for patch tracking >>>>>>> >>>>>>> As for #3, again, I don't want us to take on a burdensome patch tracking >>>>>>> process that is more effort than it is worth, and the lack of people >>>>>>> jumping to even manage a simple web page for current 8.3 patches has me >>>>>>> questioning what kind of support a burdensome tracking system would >>>>>>> receive. >>>>>> I don't recall hearing you ask for people to help with a web page. >>>>> I want create and maintain a web page that tracks where we are on each >>>>> 8.3 patch, but have had not takers. >>>> are you thinking about something like >>>> http://developer.postgresql.org/index.php/Todo:WishlistFor83 on steriods >>>> (ie with more references to actual patches and discussion and >>>> explaination of functionality) or something completely different ? >>>> I'm a bit unsure on how this webpage would differ from a typical >>>> bugtracker ... >>>> Maybe you could give a concrete example for a particular patch in the >>>> queue so that everybody can follow ? >>> At this point, just one line for each patch, and who is working on it: >>> >>> Patch, Author Committer >>> HOT Pavan ? >>> XML misc Peter >>> etc. >>> >> that would be easy to do on either the wishlist or a seperate wiki page >> and I would volunteer to do that if you think it is useful. > > OK, you have to go back to Tom's email stating where we are on each > patch, then look over the patch application and find out which ones have > been applied. Also you have to read the replies to find out who has > taken ownership of patches. ok I did a rough sketch of how I interpreted your proposal on http://developer.postgresql.org/index.php/Todo:PatchStatus. This table is by far not complete yet(more of a PoC) but I wanted to get some feedback if I'm on the right track before I put more time into this. Stefan
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: