Re: Windows support - PostgreSQL 8.0 and 8.1
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Windows support - PostgreSQL 8.0 and 8.1 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4631E450.7060004@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Windows support - PostgreSQL 8.0 and 8.1 (Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Windows support - PostgreSQL 8.0 and 8.1
Re: Windows support - PostgreSQL 8.0 and 8.1 |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Dave Page wrote: > > * The stats collector bug which prevented stats being collected > reliably, thus causing all the expected knock on effects (including > near-total failure of autovacuum). The 8.2 fix for this was dependent > on the redesign of the collector to remove the separate stats buffering > process. > > * Semaphore issues, fixed by the native implementation in 8.2. > > > I think these two justify declaring the Windows port at EOL prior to 8.2. The others probably not so much. (Who cares if pg_regress is not a C program? Who besides developers uses it?) I hope this will be a one-off exercise, though. In general we should declare releases to be at EOL, not ports. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: