Tom Lane wrote:
> There's another issue with the psqlodbc tarball, which has been there
> awhile but I only just realized what it is: you are shipping aclocal.m4,
> which is a derived file, without providing the upstream files needed to
> recreate it. Specifically, there's no sign of a source file for the
> PGAC_xxx macros needed by configure.ac.
>
> This makes life difficult for packagers who need to re-run aclocal
> (in my case, because Red Hat ships a different automake version than
> you guys are using). I believe it's also a violation of the LGPL.
Hmm, thats how Peter designed it for us so we didn't have to have our
own copies of all the PG macros iirc. I don't have enough autoconf foo
to know how best to fix it though. Peter?
Regards, Dave