Re: Warning compiling pg_dump (MinGW, Windows XP)
От | Pavel Golub |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Warning compiling pg_dump (MinGW, Windows XP) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 462853531.20110118114026@gf.microolap.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Warning compiling pg_dump (MinGW, Windows XP) (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Warning compiling pg_dump (MinGW, Windows XP)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hello, Andrew. You wrote: AD> On 01/17/2011 03:51 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> Andrew Dunstan<andrew@dunslane.net> writes: >>> On 01/17/2011 07:18 AM, Pavel Golub wrote: >>>> So you think I should just ignore these warnings? Because I can't >>>> remember the same behaviour on 8.x branches... >>> We've had them all along, as I said. See >>> <http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=frogmouth&dt=2011-01-04%2023%3A54%3A16&stg=make> >>> for the same thing in an 8.2 build. >> I wonder why mingw's gcc is complaining about %m when other versions of >> gcc do not? If you can't get it to shut up about that, there's not >> going to be much percentage in silencing warnings about %lld. >> >> AD> We could add -Wno-format to the flags. That makes it shut up, but maybe AD> we don't want to use such a sledgehammer. I want to understand the only thing. Are these warnings really dangerous? Or I should just ignore them? AD> cheers AD> andrew -- With best wishes,Pavel mailto:pavel@gf.microolap.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: