Re: Grantor name gets lost when grantor role dropped
От | Russell Smith |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Grantor name gets lost when grantor role dropped |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 46247F2B.4050706@pws.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Grantor name gets lost when grantor role dropped (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Grantor name gets lost when grantor role dropped
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Jeff Davis wrote: > > >> CREATE ROLE test_role >> NOSUPERUSER INHERIT NOCREATEDB NOCREATEROLE; >> >> CREATE ROLE invalid_grantor >> SUPERUSER INHERIT NOCREATEDB NOCREATEROLE; >> >> SET ROLE invalid_grantor; >> GRANT "postgres" TO "test_role"; >> SET ROLE postgres; >> >> select * from pg_roles; >> >> select pg_auth_members.*, ur.rolname, gr.rolname from pg_auth_members LEFT JOIN pg_roles ur ON roleid = oid >> LEFT JOIN pg_roles gr ON gr.oid = grantor; >> >> DROP ROLE invalid_grantor; >> >> select pg_auth_members.*, ur.rolname, gr.rolname from pg_auth_members LEFT JOIN pg_roles ur ON roleid = oid >> LEFT JOIN pg_roles gr ON gr.oid = grantor; >> >> DROP ROLE test_role; >> > > The problem here is that we allowed the drop of invalid_grantor. We are > missing a shared dependency on it. > So does this make a todo item? But this still leaves the concerns about you can currently get the database into an invalid state that can't be dumped and restored.
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: