Re: RESET command seems pretty disjointed now
От | Mark Kirkwood |
---|---|
Тема | Re: RESET command seems pretty disjointed now |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4622BE5A.6060101@paradise.net.nz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RESET command seems pretty disjointed now (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: RESET command seems pretty disjointed now
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > The current documentation for RESET exhibits a certain lack of, um, > intellectual cohesiveness: > > Name > > RESET -- restore the value of a run-time parameter to the default value > > Synopsis > > RESET configuration_parameter > RESET ALL > RESET { PLANS | SESSION | TEMP | TEMPORARY } > > > That one-line summary has got approximately zip to do with the newly > added options; as does most of the Description section. At the very > least this manual page needs an extensive rewrite. But I wonder whether > the real problem isn't that we chose a bad name for the new commands. > Is there another keyword we could use instead of RESET? A concrete > objection to the current state of affairs is that absolutely anyone, > looking at this set of options with no prior knowledge of PG, would > expect that RESET ALL subsumes all the other cases. Maybe DISCARD for the plans etc might be more intuitive than extending RESET? Mark
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: