Re: PostgreSQL domains and NOT NULL constraint
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL domains and NOT NULL constraint |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 461950.1698109348@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL domains and NOT NULL constraint (Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com> writes: > On Mon, 23 Oct 2023, 19:34 Tom Lane, <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> After ruminating on this for awhile, here's a straw-man proposal: >> ... > How does this work w.r.t. concurrently created tables that contain the > domain? It wouldn't change that at all I think. I had noticed that we'd probably need to tweak validateDomainConstraint() to ensure it applies the same semantics that INSERT/UPDATE do --- although with Isaac's idea to enable better tracking of which constraints will fail on NULL, maybe just a blind application of the constraint expression will still be close enough. I agree that concurrent transactions can create violations of the new constraint, but (a) that's true now, (b) I have no good ideas about how to improve it, and (c) it seems like an independent problem. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: