Re: SCSI vs SATA
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SCSI vs SATA |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 46185F7C.5070408@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: SCSI vs SATA (david@lang.hm) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
>>> I believe that the biggest cause for data loss from people useing the >>> 'cheap' drives is due to the fact that one 'cheap' drive holds the >>> capacity of 5 or so 'expensive' drives, and since people don't >>> realize this they don't realize that the time to rebuild the failed >>> drive onto a hot-spare is correspondingly longer. >> Commodity HDs get 1 year warranties for the same reason enterprise HDs >> get 5+ year warranties: the vendor's confidence that they are not >> going to lose money honoring the warranty in question. > > at least seagate gives 5 year warranties on their consumer drives. Hitachi 3 years Maxtor 3 years Samsung 1-3 years depending on drive (but who buys samsung drives) Seagate 5 years (300 Gig, 7200 RPM perpendicular recording... 89 bucks) Western Digital 3-5 years depending on drive Joshua D. Drake -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: