Re: What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for?
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 46165596.8080907@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for? (Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for?
Re: What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Larry Rosenman wrote: > It doesn't matter as far as MY box is concerned. I use VMWare > extensively > in my current $DAYJOB, and I want to be able to test/play with things > related > to that as well. The box I'm building will be using the (free) VMWare > Server > as it's virtualization platform. > > I'd still like to hear from a Tom Lane or someone else on the project > with what > X86 or X86_64 OS's we need coverage for. > > VMWare Server is indeed a fine product, which I use extensively. I am not sure what our Windows support is like for x86_64. Magnus has one for MSVC (for which buildfarm support is nearly done, but not quite). But I don't see one for MinGW. OTOH, Windows is not free (in either sense) and setting up a build environment there is quite a bit harder than on Unix platforms. The other platform I've whined about missing for some time is HP-UX, especially on PA-RISC. But that's a whole different story. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: