Re: SCSI vs SATA
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SCSI vs SATA |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4613C954.8050203@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: SCSI vs SATA (Andreas Kostyrka <andreas@kostyrka.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: SCSI vs SATA
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
> difference. OTOH, the SCSI discs were way less reliable than the SATA > discs, that might have been bad luck. Probably bad luck. I find that SCSI is very reliable, but I don't find it any more reliable than SATA. That is assuming correct ventilation etc... Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake > > Andreas > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to > choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not > match > -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: