Re: Concurrent connections in psql
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Concurrent connections in psql |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 46098B81.6080403@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Concurrent connections in psql ("Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs wrote: > On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 17:11 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > >> Simon Riggs wrote: >> >>> I would love, love, love to be able to use this syntax within pg_dump as >>> well, so we can create multiple indexes in parallel at restore time. >>> Anyone fancy adding that as well? We should be able to speed up overall >>> index builds by x2 using concurrent builds. >>> > > >> You will need to teach pg_restore any trick you use here - it doesn't >> use psql. >> > > The proposed change is to psql and making it work with pg_restore would > take a lot more thought, so probably not an 8.3 item. Should we make it > to neither because we can't make it to both? > > I'm all for the change to psql, but personally I think it's late in the day to be specifying a change to pg_dump. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: