Re: [PATCHES] Bitmapscan changes
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCHES] Bitmapscan changes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 46015BE2.7010001@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCHES] Bitmapscan changes (Grzegorz Jaskiewicz <gj@pointblue.com.pl>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCHES] Bitmapscan changes
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Grzegorz Jaskiewicz wrote: > > On Mar 19, 2007, at 11:16 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > >> Grzegorz Jaskiewicz wrote: >>> On Mar 16, 2007, at 10:12 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: >>>> You'll obviously need to run it with the patch applied. I'd suggest >>>> to enable stats_block_level to see the effect on buffer cache >>>> hit/miss ratio. >>> groupeditems-42-pghead.patch.gz is enough, or it needs >>> maintain_cluster_order_v5.patch ?? >> >> No, it won't make a difference unless you're inserting to the table, >> and the inserts are not in cluster order. > well, that's okay than. I see really good improvement in terms of speed > and db size (which reflects obviously in i/o performance). > Let me know if further testing can be done. I would happily see it in > mainline. If you have a real-world database you could try it with, that would be nice. The test I sent you is pretty much a best-case scenario, it'd be interesting to get anecdotal evidence of improvements in real applications. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: